Chief MD, Gangnam
Duk-ha Kim
The trust our patients have placed in this clinic was built on conviction and principle. We intend to hold to both, unchanged, through the next hundred years.
Seoul
Lateral canthus and temporal thread-lift evidence guide
A fox eye thread lift places sutures at the lateral canthus (outer eye corner) and the temporal area to lift and outward-tilt the outer eye corner — the look the “fox eye” name refers to. That is a narrower target than the cheek- or midface-wide suspension the other thread-lift pages on this site describe, and the peer-reviewed evidence located for this specific site is two case series: a 22-case series of thread suspension at the lateral canthus and temporal area, graded evidence level V, and an 84-case series that combined lower blepharoplasty with midface suspension rather than testing thread suspension alone.
A fox eye thread lift places sutures at the lateral canthus and the temporal area to lift and outward-tilt the outer eye corner — the look the “fox eye” name refers to. That is a narrower target than the cheek- or midface-wide suspension the other thread-lift pages on this site describe, and it is also why this page draws on a different, smaller set of peer-reviewed sources specific to that region.

No product, brand or trademarked technique named “fox eye” appears in the sources reviewed for this page. The term describes an aesthetic outcome — an outward tilt at the outer eye corner — and the peer-reviewed literature located here refers to the procedure by its anatomic target, thread suspension at the lateral canthus and temporal area, rather than by that marketing name.
The other thread-lift topics on this site describe suspension across a broader area, such as the cheek, midface or nose. A fox eye thread lift narrows that target to two adjacent regions, the lateral canthus and the temporal area, and the evidence reviewed for this page is scoped to that narrower target rather than to thread lifting in general.
The lateral canthus is the outer corner where the upper and lower eyelids meet; the temporal area sits at the side of the forehead, above and behind that corner. The case series reviewed for this page places thread suspension in both locations together, which is the anatomic basis for the outward-tilted result the “fox eye” name describes.
A case series published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open in 2026 reports on 22 cases of thread suspension placed at the lateral canthus and temporal area, using PDO sutures. The outcomes it tracks are lateral canthal tilt and temporal ptosis — whether the outer-corner angle and the temple tissue position changed — and this page states that these were the tracked outcomes without repeating specific figures, since a 22-case series without a comparison group is not a basis for a general number.
Evidence level V is the grade used for a case series or expert opinion reported without a comparison group. For the 22-case series, that means the report describes what happened in the cases treated, but there is no control group to show what would have happened without the thread suspension, or to compare this approach against another technique at the same site.
A series published in JPRAS Open in 2026 reports on 84 cases that combined lower blepharoplasty with midface thread suspension. That is a surgical procedure performed together with thread placement, not a report of thread suspension used on its own.
Sources: JPRAS Open 2026 — series combining lower blepharoplasty with midface suspension (84 cases)
Because its reported outcomes reflect the combined effect of lower blepharoplasty and midface thread suspension together, not what thread suspension would produce by itself. A patient considering a thread-only procedure at the lateral canthus and temporal area cannot read this series as evidence for that narrower scenario.
Sources: JPRAS Open 2026 — series combining lower blepharoplasty with midface suspension (84 cases)
Not directly. One reports thread suspension alone at the lateral canthus and temporal area in 22 cases at evidence level V; the other reports a combined surgical and thread procedure in 84 cases with a different site emphasis, the lower eyelid and midface. The comparison table below sets out that difference in design rather than ranking one study over the other.
Sources: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2026 — case series of thread suspension at the lateral canthus and temporal area (22 cases, evidence level V)JPRAS Open 2026 — series combining lower blepharoplasty with midface suspension (84 cases)
Because neither source reviewed for this page reports a general figure of that kind for the lateral canthus and temporal area. The 22-case series names its outcome measures without this page extracting a number from a case series graded evidence level V, and the 84-case series describes a different, combined procedure. No number for a fox eye thread lift specifically is stated on this page because none is sourced at that level.
Sources: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2026 — case series of thread suspension at the lateral canthus and temporal area (22 cases, evidence level V)JPRAS Open 2026 — series combining lower blepharoplasty with midface suspension (84 cases)
The lateral canthus and temporal area sit close to the eyelid margin and eye socket, a different anatomic context from the cheek or nose covered elsewhere on this site. Within what the two sources reviewed here cover, that is a reason to treat this site on its own terms in a consultation rather than assuming findings from a cheek or midface thread lift transfer directly to the eye area.
The other thread-lift pages on this site, drawing on a broader meta-analysis of thread lifting, cover pooled complication figures for the technique in general. This page does not repeat those figures here, because they were not measured for the lateral canthus and temporal area specifically, and applying them to this narrower site would overstate what they can show.
No. The 22-case series reviewed here used PDO sutures, but that describes the material used in that particular study population, not a material a given clinic will necessarily use for you. Ask the clinic directly for the exact product name, material and manufacturer of the thread it plans to place.
The two sources reviewed here describe different procedures: one is thread suspension by itself, the other is thread suspension performed together with lower blepharoplasty. If your own plan combines a fox eye thread lift with another procedure, the 22-case series describing thread suspension alone is not the evidence base for that combined plan, and vice versa — ask which of the two scenarios most closely matches what is actually planned for you.
Sources: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2026 — case series of thread suspension at the lateral canthus and temporal area (22 cases, evidence level V)JPRAS Open 2026 — series combining lower blepharoplasty with midface suspension (84 cases)
Neither source reviewed for this page states a follow-up length or a duration figure for thread suspension at the lateral canthus and temporal area — the 22-case series is graded evidence level V, a case series without a comparison group, and it names its outcome measures (lateral canthal tilt, temporal ptosis) without this page extracting a number from that grade of evidence; the 84-case series describes a different, combined procedure with lower blepharoplasty, so its outcomes cannot be read as a duration for thread suspension alone. Without a stated follow-up window in either source, there is no figure here to read as “how long results last.” What is more likely to determine how a result holds up at this specific site is the thread material and technique used (the 22-case series used PDO, which resorbs, but that describes that study population rather than a fixed answer for every clinic), whether the procedure is combined with a surgical step such as blepharoplasty, and individual differences in skin and soft-tissue support at the eye area. Ask the clinic what evidence, if any, it is citing for how long a fox eye thread lift result lasts at this specific site, and how it defines when a revision or repeat procedure would be considered.
Sources: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2026 — case series of thread suspension at the lateral canthus and temporal area (22 cases, evidence level V)JPRAS Open 2026 — series combining lower blepharoplasty with midface suspension (84 cases)
Ask for the exact thread material, manufacturer and specification rather than relying on the name “fox eye” to describe it. Ask whether the procedure is planned as thread suspension alone or combined with another procedure such as blepharoplasty, since the evidence for each scenario is different. Ask about the clinic’s experience with procedures at the eye area specifically, not thread lifting generally. And ask what the revision process would involve, and who bears the cost, if asymmetry or hollowing appears afterward.
These rows compare the design of the two sources reviewed for this page. A single case series cannot establish which approach is safer or more effective, so treat this as a summary of what each study can and cannot show rather than a ranking.
| Study | What it treated | Sample size and evidence level | What it can tell you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lateral canthus + temporal series (PRS Global Open, 2026) | Thread suspension alone at the lateral canthus and temporal area, PDO sutures | 22 cases, evidence level V (case series, no comparison group) | Describes outcomes for thread suspension by itself at this specific site |
| Combined blepharoplasty + midface series (JPRAS Open, 2026) | Lower blepharoplasty combined with midface thread suspension | 84 cases | Describes outcomes for a combined procedure — not what thread suspension alone would produce |
Neither study reports a population-level complication rate for a fox eye thread lift specifically; this table compares study design, not safety.
Sources: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2026 — case series of thread suspension at the lateral canthus and temporal area (22 cases, evidence level V)JPRAS Open 2026 — series combining lower blepharoplasty with midface suspension (84 cases)
Care is provided by the medical team at the branch you select. These clinicians lead the three branches linked from this guide; confirm the doctor assigned to your visit with that branch.
Chief MD, Gangnam
The trust our patients have placed in this clinic was built on conviction and principle. We intend to hold to both, unchanged, through the next hundred years.
Chief MD, Myeongdong
I want to be thinking about how the patient feels right up to the last moment of the procedure.
Chief MD, Hongdae
I will give my best with the attentiveness to catch even the smallest change.
Listed branch medical team — not a medical-review byline for this article.
It is a thread-suspension procedure aimed at the lateral canthus (outer eye corner) and the temporal area, intended to produce the outward-tilted eye shape the term describes. That is a narrower target than the cheek- or midface-wide procedures covered by the other thread-lift pages on this site.
No — the sources reviewed for this page do not tie that name to a specific product, brand or trademarked technique. It describes an aesthetic result, and the literature located here refers to the procedure by its anatomic target instead.
The lateral canthus, the outer corner where the eyelids meet, and the temporal area beside it. The case series reviewed for this page places thread suspension in both locations together.
It reported on 22 cases of thread suspension placed at the lateral canthus and temporal area, using PDO sutures, with lateral canthal tilt and temporal ptosis tracked as outcome measures. The series is graded evidence level V, meaning it has no comparison group.
It is the grade used for a case series or expert opinion without a comparison group. That means the 22-case report describes what happened in those cases but cannot show what would have happened without the procedure, or how it compares to another technique.
It reported on 84 cases that combined lower blepharoplasty with midface thread suspension — a surgical procedure performed together with thread placement, not thread suspension used alone.
Because its outcomes reflect the combined effect of blepharoplasty and thread suspension together, not what thread suspension alone would produce. It is not evidence for a thread-only procedure at the lateral canthus and temporal area.
Not directly, because they describe different procedures — thread suspension alone in one, a combined surgical and thread procedure in the other — with a different site emphasis. The comparison table on this page sets out that design difference rather than ranking one above the other.
Because neither source reviewed here reports a general figure of that kind for the lateral canthus and temporal area specifically. A 22-case series graded evidence level V and an 84-case series describing a combined procedure are not sourced to a number for a fox eye thread lift on its own, so none is stated on this page.
Because the lateral canthus and temporal area sit close to the eyelid margin and eye socket, a different anatomic context from the cheek or nose covered elsewhere on this site. Within what the two sources here cover, that is reason enough to treat this site on its own terms in a consultation.
The other thread-lift pages on this site, drawing on a broader meta-analysis, cover pooled complication figures for thread lifting in general. This page does not repeat those figures because they were not measured for the lateral canthus and temporal area specifically.
No. The 22-case series reviewed here used PDO sutures for its study population, but that does not determine what material a given clinic will use for you — ask directly for the product name, material and manufacturer.
The two sources here describe different procedures — one thread suspension by itself, the other thread suspension combined with lower blepharoplasty. Ask which scenario matches what is actually planned for you, since the evidence for each is different.
Confirm the exact thread material, manufacturer and specification; whether the procedure is planned alone or combined with another procedure such as blepharoplasty; the clinic’s experience with procedures at the eye area specifically; and what the revision process and cost would be if asymmetry or hollowing appears afterward.
We started in Gangnam in 2006 and the network now runs 17 branches across Korea. The line we work to is skin transformation woven into everyday life — care you can keep up with, rather than one dramatic change.
Free Consultation
There is no inquiry form on this page. Once you have picked a branch above, open that branch’s site or the official reservation center and choose a time yourself.