Premium Facial Care

Premium facial care bundles several items — what are you actually buying?

A group of separately named items sold under one heading, which is a retail structure rather than a procedure class. The items under it usually reduce to three kinds. A device step: something driven across or held over the skin by hardware. A product step: something applied to the skin, often named after its container rather than its contents. And a scheduling step: an extra taken during the same visit, or a run of visits sold as one unit. Those three kinds have completely different amounts of public record behind them — hardware is classified by regulators, ingredients can sometimes be looked up if they are named, and a bundle or a timing arrangement has no record anywhere. Splitting the heading into those parts is the whole method of this page, because a course cannot be looked up while some of its components can.

Sources: FDA product classification GFE — powered dermabrasion brushPubMed — topical oxygen and skin, randomized trials

How do you tell a clinic-coined name from a standard procedure term?

Test whether the name returns anything in a record the clinic does not control: a device classification database, a statute, a clinical guideline, a peer-reviewed index. A standard term does. Dermabrasion, for instance, carries a product code, a regulation number and a device class. A coined name returns the clinic that sells it and nothing further, so the only verifiable statement about it is that the clinic offers it. This is not an accusation; house names are ordinary retail practice everywhere, and a clinic is entitled to name what it sells. It does fix what can be said honestly. Watch the reverse trap too: a name containing a real word is not thereby a standard term. The real word has to be the thing that is classified, not decoration around a menu item, and words like ampoule describe a container rather than a procedure.

Sources: FDA product classification GFE — powered dermabrasion brush21 CFR 878.4820 — dermabrasion device (GPO)

Is a facial oxygen step confirmed by anything?

Not as a cosmetic procedure, and the search behind that is short enough to repeat. A PubMed search restricted to topical oxygen, skin and randomized returns six records, and all six sit in chronic wound care — diabetic foot ulcers and comparable non-healing wounds. None of them applies oxygen to facial skin for appearance. Two separate things are therefore true at once and should not be merged: topical oxygen has randomised trials in a clinical setting that has nothing to do with a facial, and facial oxygen has none. Read the limit precisely. This is not a finding that a facial oxygen step does nothing, because no trial asked the question and an absent trial is not a negative result. It means the step sits outside both the standard classification and the trial literature at once — no standard classification, no randomised evidence — so any expectation attached to it comes from the clinic rather than from a published source.

Sources: PubMed — topical oxygen and skin, randomized trials

The course name is not classified anywhere — so which part of it is?

The hardware itself has a classification record, and it is the most concrete thing on a care menu. In the United States a powered dermabrasion brush is listed under product code GFE at 21 CFR 878.4820, Class I, 510(k) exempt. Three consequences follow. The record attaches to the device, not to the menu item built around it, so it tells you what family of hardware is in the room and nothing about a named course. Class I is the lowest of the three US device tiers. And 510(k) exempt means the manufacturer does not file a premarket notification, in the record’s own words: ‘The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures…’. A wet or fluid-assisted variant sold under a clinic name is not separately classified in anything located for this page. Korean device registration for the specific unit in use is a question for the clinic.

Sources: FDA product classification GFE — powered dermabrasion brush21 CFR 878.4820 — dermabrasion device (GPO)

Does 510(k) exempt mean approved, or does it mean risky?

It means one filing step is not required, and it is neither an endorsement nor a warning. Two misreadings are common and both go wrong in the same place. The first turns exemption into approval: phrasing such as ‘FDA class’ on a menu can be read as though an agency examined a claim about results. At this tier no premarket review of efficacy or indications takes place, so there is no review to cite and no claim that was ever tested. The second turns exemption into alarm, treating an exempt device as an unregulated one. The exemption is from the premarket notification procedure specifically, not a statement that nothing else in the device framework applies. What is left is narrow and useful: the hardware class is on the record, the review that would test a results claim never happened, and the course built around the hardware is outside the record entirely.

Sources: FDA product classification GFE — powered dermabrasion brush21 CFR 878.4820 — dermabrasion device (GPO)

How should an ampoule add-on or a same-day extra be read?

As a line on an invoice until someone states what is in it. Ampoule names a sealed container and, by extension, a single dose of liquid: it is a packaging and dosage-form word borrowed into menu language, and it identifies no active substance, no concentration and no procedure. Two menus can both list an ampoule add-on and share nothing else. The same applies to an extra described only by when it happens, such as a same-day addition — timing is a scheduling fact, not a description of what is done. The questions that turn an add-on into something checkable are direct: which ingredient and at what concentration, whether it is applied to intact skin or after an abrasive or needling step has disrupted the barrier, whether it is regulated in Korea as a cosmetic, a device or a medicine, and who applies it. Where none of that is answered, the add-on cannot be compared with an add-on anywhere else, and this page attaches no effect to the word.

Sources: Korea Medical Service Act Article 27 — unlicensed medical practice

How do you read a recommended course or package?

By taking it apart, because bundling carries no evidential weight of its own. A course records what a clinic groups and sells together; it says nothing about what the grouping produces, and none of the sources on this page tests any combination of steps. Three steps sold as one unit do not inherit support from each other, and a combination has no record even when one component does. Two things also hide inside a course. Substitution: if a step is dropped or swapped on the day, what you received is no longer what you compared. Fixed counts: a run of visits bought in advance commits money before the first session has been seen. So ask for the course written out as an ordered list of steps with the time each one takes, ask which steps are omitted or exchanged if the skin reacts, ask whether the visit count is fixed, and ask what happens to unused visits if you stop partway.

Sources: FDA product classification GFE — powered dermabrasion brush

Which Korean provisions apply to a care step, and what do they leave open?

Through two provisions that address different parties, and the boundary that matters most to a menu is not one this page can settle. Article 27(1) of the Medical Service Act provides that a person who is not a licensed medical person may not perform medical practice, and that a licensed medical person may not perform medical practice outside the scope of their licence. Separately, Table 4 of the Enforcement Rule of the Public Health Control Act, item 4, lists acts a beauty business operator may not perform: mole removal, ear piercing, double-eyelid surgery, tattooing, skin peeling, and other similar medical practices. Together they mark two ends of a line. What they do not resolve is the middle — whether, and how far, a member of staff who is not a licensed medical person may carry out a particular care step inside a medical institution. That boundary has been worked out through case law and administrative interpretation, neither of which was verified for this page, so nothing here should be read as a rule about which staff may perform which step. The checkable version of the question belongs in the consultation room: who performs each step, and under what licence.

Sources: Korea Medical Service Act Article 27 — unlicensed medical practiceKorea Public Health Control Act Enforcement Rule, Table 4

What expectation is reasonable when the record is this thin?

One that is explicit about which tier each claim sits in. Tier one is hardware with a classification record, which establishes what class of device is being used and nothing about what it achieves, because efficacy is not reviewed at that tier. Tier two is a named ingredient at a stated concentration, which can at least be researched independently; no such literature was collected for this page, so the tier is a route rather than a result here. Tier three is everything named only by the clinic — the course title, the add-on label, the oxygen step — where no external record exists at all and any expectation is the clinic’s own statement. Keeping the tiers apart prevents the common slide in which a device classification, a container word and a package name blur into a single impression of authority. It is also worth separating what is observable on the day, such as how a session is run and how long it takes, from durable change, which none of the sources on this page measures.

Sources: FDA product classification GFE — powered dermabrasion brushPubMed — topical oxygen and skin, randomized trials

How long does the effect last?

How long any visible change lasts follows from which tier a step sits in, not from the course name. A device with a classification record, such as a powered dermabrasion brush, works by physically abrading the surface, so what is felt afterward is largely skin turnover — a cycle that runs on your own schedule, not on a duration the classification record measures. An ingredient at a stated concentration can in principle have absorption or persistence data behind it, but no such literature was collected for this page, so nothing here quotes one for any add-on. A step named only by the clinic carries no external record at all, which means its duration is whatever the clinic states, not something this page can check. Ask the clinic, for each step, how soon they expect any visible change to fade, how that estimate was reached, and how many repeat sessions their own course assumes rather than how many the package happens to bundle.

Sources: FDA product classification GFE — powered dermabrasion brushPubMed — topical oxygen and skin, randomized trials

Before you pay for a package, what has to be written down?

Ask for the course as a written list of steps, then handle each step separately. Per step: whether it is a device, a product or neither; the device name and its class if hardware is used; the ingredient and concentration if something is applied; how long the step takes; who performs it and under what licence; and whether it can be dropped. For the course as a whole: the number of visits, whether that count is fixed, what is substituted if the skin reacts, and what happens to unused visits. Disclose active skin infection, eczema, rosacea or inflamed or broken skin, recent peels, lasers or energy devices, isotretinoin use, pregnancy or breastfeeding, known ingredient allergies, and any recent injectable treatment, since several of these bear on whether an abrasive or occlusive step is appropriate at all. The following is general post-procedure safety guidance rather than a finding of the sources cited here: contact the clinic promptly for pain that increases instead of settling, blistering, spreading redness or warmth, drainage, or a rash extending beyond the treated area. Seek emergency care for difficulty breathing or sudden swelling of the lips, mouth, tongue or throat.

Sources: Korea Medical Service Act Article 27 — unlicensed medical practiceFDA product classification GFE — powered dermabrasion brush

Which parts of a care menu can be looked up, and which cannot?

The table sorts the kinds of item that appear under a care heading by the external record located for each. It ranks nothing and predicts no result: an item in a row that has a record does not thereby work, and an item with no record has not been shown to fail.

A record that exists is a record of what something is, not of what it does. The device classification describes hardware at a tier where results are not reviewed, the oxygen search covers chronic wounds rather than facial appearance, and packaging words and bundle names have no record at all. Where a step cannot be reduced to a device, a named ingredient or a documented classification, the accurate description is that its content is unknown to the reader.

Sources: FDA product classification GFE — powered dermabrasion brush21 CFR 878.4820 — dermabrasion device (GPO)PubMed — topical oxygen and skin, randomized trials

Frequently asked questions

How Abijou works

We started in Gangnam in 2006 and the network now runs 17 branches across Korea. The line we work to is skin transformation woven into everyday life — care you can keep up with, rather than one dramatic change.

• Across the 17 branches in Seoul, Gyeonggi, Incheon and Busan: over 1,000 medical professionals and more than 350 certified medical devices
• Authentic products only, in appropriate amounts — the treatment is fitted to the condition, not to a package
• Prices are quoted from each branch’s published price list as it stands

Contact and location

Phone

1544-0377

Contact & bookingAbijou official site

Continue reading

The Seoul guide holds the full sourced explanation; this page focuses on verified availability, access and booking.

• Abijou Gangnam
• Abijou Myeongdong
• Abijou Hongdae
• Premium Peeling
• Acne Care
• Sebum and Pore Care
• LDM Ultrasound Care
• Hydration Care
• Calming & Regeneration Care
• Skin Precision Diagnosis